Go to page 1
  Forum » General » League 4 / 4 on fire! Date
Username
1798 msgs.
International
 So as long as a post contains some info defending @'s it's ok to have thread re-opened, but as soon as things are turning to backfire some @ it's re-closed again? Give me a break... either stick to the "no punishments and cheating are to be discussed on forums" or let the discussion flow.

Edited by Horath 11-09-2011 02:30 		11/09/2011 02:20
  - Div/Gr
Username
2108 msgs.
Best scorer
 In all honesty, one consistent standard when dealing with these cases, all this retaining is ridiculous, there's gotta be some sort of free speech allowed on here. Like the pirates said if Gunner and Reb had done such a thing they would have been fined 10m each for match fixing, and that'd be the end of it, no chance to defend themselves, no 3 points to defend themselves. The winning team would have had enough points deducted to not be promoted, and likely the other team too. Anyone who would have tried to defend them would have simply been ignored.

The second it's 2 @'s in the mix now, suddenly they are right, and everyone who argues gets retained for 3 days. NO MORE DOUBLE STANDARDS HERE GUYS! it's ridiculous! If the pirates did this, no one would retain the accusors for accusing!

I'm not saying the admins are lying, personally I think they aren't, and that points 2 and 3 were just the @'s trying to give themselves a more solid standing, which totally backfired upon themselves. Also not cool on whoever unlocked the thread so that the @'s had a second chance to defend themselves. Locking should be final, any words after that should be kept to themselves. Same thing with Horath though. He reopened a closed topic, and I can't have a double standard right after denouncing them.

I will wear my retention proudly when it comes, risking my last hostile of the year on this. If my team ends up not doing the best next year, its because I had the audacity to point out an injustice. Apologies to my fellow leaguemates for not giving them the competition they deserve.


Lets just hope that there will no longer be @'s in the same league together. 		11/09/2011 03:12
  - Div/Gr
175 msgs.
Substitute
 Agree...

For me, all facts and explanations are very murky. 		11/09/2011 03:15
  - Div/Gr
Username
2960 msgs.
Best scorer
 i read previous topic and i must say it was very funny
first that person dont want to go in div.3,after he didnt see that is league game,promote gk for more avg...

even if all of this is true it doesnt matter !!!!

u must decide is this alowed or not !

if its ok no problem,if its not penalty for both

my point of view 		11/09/2011 04:00
  Mr. Q17 - Div1/Gr1
Username
4820 msgs.
Best scorer
 It seems like everything is alright if u got an @ before you. Now these people are actually showing that they are gods here (but devils for others) and nobody can touch them.. 11/09/2011 04:05
  - Div/Gr
Username
2737 msgs.
Best scorer
 Even if jeys did not want to get promoted, it is still match fixing to help jeys get what he wants!!! Still against rule 9. 11/09/2011 05:14
  - Div/Gr
Username
2108 msgs.
Best scorer
solirocket said:
Even if jeys did not want to get promoted, it is still match fixing to help jeys get what he wants!!! Still against rule 9.



HA! All too true!

Lawyered.


Come on e'rybody weigh in! Join the bus to Bannopolis! 		11/09/2011 05:45
  - Div/Gr
Username
1835 msgs.
International
hewhoamareismyself said:
solirocket said:
Even if jeys did not want to get promoted, it is still match fixing to help jeys get what he wants!!! Still against rule 9.



HA! All too true!

Lawyered.


Come on e'rybody weigh in! Join the bus to Bannopolis!


Sign me up!
 11/09/2011 06:02
  - Div/Gr
Username
677 msgs.
MVP of the game
 Am waiting for an explanation as to why rebsiot's and slipi's teams were retained. 11/09/2011 07:36
  - Div/Gr
Username
6256 msgs.
Golden Ball
 Madness, I missed all the fun by getting drunk and not checking the forums properly. I can't believe that after a blatant case of cheating, that the teams who get punished were the ones who reported it.

Under rule 9, all three of the teams involved should have been punished. Who watches the watchmen indeed, obviously no one who cares.

I also just checked the rules maybe slipi and reb thought that the typo in rule 1 was correct and Attacks on mods really will be tolerated

1) ADMINISTRATORS and MODERATORS:
This is a public forum under administrator, fiscals and moderator's control and participation constitutes tacit acceptance of that authority, including the authority to accept, reject, delete, close, move applicants and their posts. Any attack on the administrators, fiscals and Moderators will be tolerated.

 11/09/2011 09:00
  - Div/Gr
     
Go to page 1
1