| Forum » Foro Dv7/Gr693 » BALL CRUSHER SOLD | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Username
5569 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
I agree. I won't discuss that particular case, but we are trying to refigure how to deal with 'high value' players (i.e. players 70+ or high progression/FC) There's no good way to figure it out right now. |
13/01/2012 19:00 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
997 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
ANOOOO said: @rebsiot said: Someone hostiled my semi-star IM for $300M That guy, look at his crappy team now, just like the guy who hostiled my LM 86 for 173m and DFM 72 for 60m, then I was fined 70m with a reason "that hostiled players were too expensive"! I think now you can understand my situation better. Wait a sec! Are you saying that if someone hostiles my player, I can get fined because hostile clause was too much. That's such a bull###t! I set hostile clause high so people wouldn't hostile my players, but if someone with a lot of money really wants my player and pays his hostile clause, I shouldn't get fined. |
13/01/2012 19:10 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
5569 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
Stop for a second. This has always been the case. and fine = market correction. If someone hostiles a player (normal player, not high value as i said) for triple it's normal value, you will have the amount deducted that is different from market value. IF you feel that is too much, simply ask and make a simple case (look, i can't replace him for less than x). It's as simple as that. You are not given a penalty for that. Just having an amount moved to correct for market. As I said, we are trying to standardize this stuff to a large degree, and the points are valid, but we've been fiscal for all of 10 days. I can only tell you how it is now. I can say that several adjustments have been made on appeal, so just say something if you think the correction is too steep, or think that the other person did it for nefarious reasons only. Ok? There is no malice here or reason to get upset over anything. |
13/01/2012 19:14 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
997 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
Hostile clauses should never be fined, regardless if the price was too high or too low. Hostile clause to me is how important is that player for my team. If I only have one CF and my hostile clause for him is at $150M, well that's how much he's worth to me. And if someone still buys him, well then the other guy thinks it's worth more than that. Noone should be penalized for that, neither side. Hostile clause and market value are different things, market value is the average, hostile clause is my personal evaluation of the player in my team. | 13/01/2012 19:18 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
997 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
To be honest I had no idea that you can get penalized for having your player hostiled from you. It's like a kick in a face. I didn't want to sell him in the first place and now you can get penalized on the top of it. Does the person who bought the player get's penalized too, or money refunded? |
13/01/2012 19:22 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
997 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
I'm done bitching... | 13/01/2012 19:28 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
4820 msgs.
Best scorer
|
So finally you have to sell him... All that publicity lead to 300m... I want your press agent . NOW. |
14/01/2012 00:36 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
3547 msgs.
Best scorer
|
300 million , he's so lucky $_$ | 14/01/2012 02:16 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
298 msgs.
First-team player
|
Romasik2000 said: ...It's like a kick in a face. I didn't want to sell him in the first place and now you can get penalized on the top of it. Exactly my whole point, thank you very much  (I'm not so good in expressing my thoughts, especially in English  )And please don't get me wrong, I didn't have any problem with @reb. We had a lengthy discussion regarding my cases and he helped me a lot. |
14/01/2012 02:44 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2968 msgs.
Best scorer
|
i ask about this situation 2 months ago,if it stays like this it will be bad for all. you will lose best player and then get money like he is on auction... |
14/01/2012 03:57 |
| FC Hrom - Div1/Gr1 | ||
2
