Go to page 1, 2
  Forum » Doubts and questions » Man marking versus zone marking Date
Username
2484 msgs.
Best scorer
 You as a manager what do you think about this tactisc and which one can you recomend. State your reason 10/02/2012 16:33
  - Div/Gr
3547 msgs.
Best scorer
 Offside - Zone
Mid-range - 50 % Zone , 50 % man
Deep Defense - Man to Man 		10/02/2012 16:51
  - Div/Gr
Username
4993 msgs.
Best scorer
 depends on effort, formation & oppenent. man marking has benefits, but can pull your players out of position.

zonal means players tend to stick closer to their formation. 		10/02/2012 16:54
  - Div/Gr
Username
2484 msgs.
Best scorer
 Thank uru for your comment but which works more effectively 10/02/2012 16:54
  - Div/Gr
Username
2484 msgs.
Best scorer
 Aleph44 do u agree wit uru 10/02/2012 16:56
  - Div/Gr
Username
1772 msgs.
International
 it depends on ur opponenet tactic. U could never say one works better than the other. 10/02/2012 16:57
  - Div/Gr
Username
2484 msgs.
Best scorer
 But how do you get to know your opponent tactics 10/02/2012 17:00
  - Div/Gr
3547 msgs.
Best scorer
Juhulius said:
But how do you get to know your opponent tactics

We never know , haha . You can watch their game , but they can just change it against you
10/02/2012 17:09
  - Div/Gr
Username
4993 msgs.
Best scorer
Juhulius said:
Aleph44 do u agree wit uru


yeah I think that's a nice clear way of putting it. take that as a starting point & experiment.
 10/02/2012 17:18
  - Div/Gr
Username
1835 msgs.
International
 I don't think DFMs man-mark, but someone should confirm. It may change how you play.

If you want to see how zone vs man works, scheudle friendlies or use your private league to test. My last weekends private league games I think I played man in the first half and zone in the second half to expirement. 		10/02/2012 17:32
  - Div/Gr
     
Go to page 1, 2
1