Go to page 1, 2
| Forum » Doubts and questions » School restriction | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Username
270 msgs.
First-team player
|
I agree with you that less juniors in the game is contraproductive. I was a little bit unclear before when I claimed that the cost of establishing schools is too low. I denoted the high quality schools as they are only X times more expensive while their produced juniors are sold for X * 10 the value etc. That makes it a cash cow for those teams who can afford it, i.e the rich teams. My point is also that the costs of establishing schools are actually good, if it was not for the exacerbating inflation. Until the inflation is controlled something needs to be done. And this is where my suggestion comes at hand. A restriction of maximum number of schools per team. A restriction to, for example, 4 schools would only affect a very few teams and it would be negligable in terms of number of juniors in the whole game. |
18/02/2012 18:44 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2737 msgs.
Best scorer
|
so what do you suggest happens to those teams that have more than 4 schools? They get refunded, or you just remove their schools? Also, juniors at excellent schools do not sell always for 10X the normal price. Not all juniors from excellent schools come out at 90 progression. Most come out at low 70s, so the price is not that much higher than a bad progression junior. The only ones that cost 10X the normal price or even more than 10X are those with 80+ progression...and they dont come that often. |
18/02/2012 22:29 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1560 msgs.
International
|
thats the truth pal.for me i think everything's in order.i'm not being personal about my team but i'm just using it as an example.you can check my schools and see the current players there! Maintening a brazil excellent school cost approximately 2m weekly.most times you don't even get players worth 1m.even when you get 80+ players if they are not in certain critical positions then you won't get something good.talking about 90+prog i.ve ñ3v3r seen one. | 19/02/2012 13:18 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1241 msgs.
International
|
I have 11 schools which they suck up to 3M weekly. And i might not even get 1M at times. The idea does not have a concrete reason. It does't cause inflation, to me it's even part of the inflation controller in the Game cos i have spent almost 150M building schools,plus maintianance since the begining of the season,you know what it is! You know the kind of quality players i ll add to my team if i decided to buy players or build more seats in my stadium. | 19/02/2012 13:45 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
Go to page 1, 2
2
