Go to page 1
  Forum » Suggestions » STAR PLAYERS Date
would you like it if these countries produced Star players on SM
YES
NO
Username
61 msgs.
Rookie
Well a lot of managers on SM have opened schools and alot of those are Excellent quality schools. so i was wondering that wouldnt it be nice since Excellent quality schools are supposed to produce Excellent players that they also once in a while produce star players(players with a star next to them on status). also to stop this from being spammed only countries who ranked 1-4 in the World Cup so far will produce Star players.
countries include
argentina
brazil
uruguay
italy
germany
england
france
netherland
mexico
spain
whoever wins or ranks in the future




i was thinking you know how they have a table for how often schools produce players based on the countries population well they make a similar table for Star players


only schools in the countries above that are in EXCELLENT QUALITY can produce star players
23/02/2012 03:16
  - Div/Gr
Username
959 msgs.
MVP of the game
-1! what if my school produce a star gk and i dont train gks then at the end of everything he ends up with 40avg. 23/02/2012 15:38
  - Div/Gr
Username
2108 msgs.
Best scorer
I like the idea because it'll cut down on inflation, but at the same time I think it ruins the @s ability to take money out of the game at ~300m increments with star players

Edited by hewhoamareismyself 23-02-2012 15:59
23/02/2012 15:59
  - Div/Gr
Username
207 msgs.
Substitute
its a decent idea because it would increase the supply of highly demanded players, thus bringing down their cost and could control inflation in some respects. But it would only control inflation for star players, not overall inflation. And, to be honest, maybe star players should have an inflated cost?

However, there are a couple of major flaws. if i understand the plan correctly, excellent schools from successful countries (Brazil, Germany, Italy, etc) would have an increased likelihood of producing star players. This would allow more people to have access to star players and reduce their price.

Most of the inflation are from the DIV2 and DIV3 teams with buckets of cash that are willing to spend 20M on a junior FC90 player. Many already have excellent schools in these countries and therefore would just benefit more from their already impressive standing. Cash would be taken out of the system by struggling team making the school investment hoping to get a star player, but i fail to see how it would control overall inflation. It might (MIGHT) reduce the inflation on a star player by making them more available, but would not change any given star players value (I think people would pay more if they could sign Xavi than a really good midfielder because its Xavi). not to mention, everyone with star players? seems excessive.
23/02/2012 17:21
  - Div/Gr
Username
61 msgs.
Rookie
u know theres always the option of loaning him Abaxido

Edited by makeenameen 24-02-2012 00:47
24/02/2012 00:47
  - Div/Gr
Username
61 msgs.
Rookie
Baltimore Wanders Fc said:
its a decent idea because it would increase the supply of highly demanded players, thus bringing down their cost and could control inflation in some respects. But it would only control inflation for star players, not overall inflation. And, to be honest, maybe star players should have an inflated cost?

However, there are a couple of major flaws. if i understand the plan correctly, excellent schools from successful countries (Brazil, Germany, Italy, etc) would have an increased likelihood of producing star players. This would allow more people to have access to star players and reduce their price.

Most of the inflation are from the DIV2 and DIV3 teams with buckets of cash that are willing to spend 20M on a junior FC90 player. Many already have excellent schools in these countries and therefore would just benefit more from their already impressive standing. Cash would be taken out of the system by struggling team making the school investment hoping to get a star player, but i fail to see how it would control overall inflation. It might (MIGHT) reduce the inflation on a star player by making them more available, but would not change any given star players value (I think people would pay more if they could sign Xavi than a really good midfielder because its Xavi). not to mention, everyone with star players? seems excessive.


i was thinking lets say a school produces a player every 2 weeks it would produce a star player every 8 - 10 weeks of course the less populated the country the longer it will take
24/02/2012 00:50
  - Div/Gr
     
Go to page 1
1