Go to page 1
| Forum » Doubts and questions » lb/rb vs ldf/rdf | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Username
131 msgs.
Substitute
|
Whats the difference? Are lb/rb faster and df better at steals? Thanks | 08/03/2012 18:07 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
609 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
well generally LB/RB are quicker but LDF/RDF are better at tackling | 08/03/2012 18:50 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Fiscal
6832 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
It depends on how they are trained, it's easy to get tackling and aggressive stats up on LDF/RDF, whereas LB/RB It's easier for speed, strength and leadership up. Edited by eamwilson 08-03-2012 23:33 |
08/03/2012 23:27 |
| Steel City - Div4/Gr64 | ||
|
Username
2108 msgs.
Best scorer
|
If you train LB/RB right I think they would be stronger than LDF/RDF. They're cheaper too. | 09/03/2012 01:24 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
3168 msgs.
Best scorer
|
RDF and LDF are useful, LB and RB are not. Just my opinion! |
09/03/2012 01:47 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
131 msgs.
Substitute
|
@Dnsvnsk said: RDF and LDF are useful, LB and RB are not. Just my opinion! really? I was thinking of using LB/RB instead of LDF/RDF due to their speed. |
09/03/2012 04:17 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
6256 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
They have a terrible turning circle, I use them simply because of the speed, but have been reconsidering recently. | 09/03/2012 15:26 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
Go to page 1
1
