Go to page 1 ... 2, 3, 4, 5
  Forum » Foro Liga Striker Football Challenge 3rd Edition » Team ave Date
Username
4993 msgs.
Best scorer
i thought of something else. what's the difference between this, and putting a player to auction way above the market value? 23/05/2012 23:50
  - Div/Gr
Username
3645 msgs.
Best scorer
players in auction cant be sold extremely out of market range. Or they will suspect cheats

there would be a fine if a 38/20 avg CF is sold in auction via direct purchase or what not for 10m.
24/05/2012 00:01
  - Div/Gr
Username
2768 msgs.
Best scorer
did not see this thread till now, this hostile thing is a mess now, I must agree i am not that happy with things going on in this game but u got to take it, as, if the @'s start telling us things they stand the danger of letting info about how they judge a case n find normal cheaters, which would make it easy for some people to cheat. It no way makes it fair to impose huge fine to mark down the transaction(hostile) to the market price they deem correct. I would rather add some 20 - 30 % or even 50% to that valuation of 'Fair' price to enable the manager to procure a replacement as we all know how difficult it is to get a replacement in the current market at the price mentioned by @'s.
It's better if they do not fine cases like where the average n age are high like 70/25 or so, as it's near impossible to find a similar player to buy....

Just an idea, let's keep our faith in them n hope for the best.
24/05/2012 03:17
  - Div/Gr
Username
2440 msgs.
Best scorer
vijji said:
did not see this thread till now, this hostile thing is a mess now, I must agree i am not that happy with things going on in this game but u got to take it, as, if the @'s start telling us things they stand the danger of letting info about how they judge a case n find normal cheaters, which would make it easy for some people to cheat. It no way makes it fair to impose huge fine to mark down the transaction(hostile) to the market price they deem correct. I would rather add some 20 - 30 % or even 50% to that valuation of 'Fair' price to enable the manager to procure a replacement as we all know how difficult it is to get a replacement in the current market at the price mentioned by @'s.
It's better if they do not fine cases like where the average n age are high like 70/25 or so, as it's near impossible to find a similar player to buy....

Just an idea, let's keep our faith in them n hope for the best.


+1000 GO Vijji!!! @VIJJI SOON!!!!
24/05/2012 03:32
  - Div/Gr
Username
1064 msgs.
International
Crack1993 said:
vijji said:
did not see this thread till now, this hostile thing is a mess now, I must agree i am not that happy with things going on in this game but u got to take it, as, if the @'s start telling us things they stand the danger of letting info about how they judge a case n find normal cheaters, which would make it easy for some people to cheat. It no way makes it fair to impose huge fine to mark down the transaction(hostile) to the market price they deem correct. I would rather add some 20 - 30 % or even 50% to that valuation of 'Fair' price to enable the manager to procure a replacement as we all know how difficult it is to get a replacement in the current market at the price mentioned by @'s.
It's better if they do not fine cases like where the average n age are high like 70/25 or so, as it's near impossible to find a similar player to buy....

Just an idea, let's keep our faith in them n hope for the best.


+1000 GO Vijji!!! @VIJJI SOON!!!!



Couldnt agree more. A sign of things to come? Hopefully not. Inflation + reckless spending =???

Keep ur head up Sreek. Easily could happen to all of us. I know I purposely set those release clauses high for the same reason.
24/05/2012 06:41
  Kind of a Big Deal ℠ - Div3/Gr11
Username
4993 msgs.
Best scorer
+ArmoKidd+ said:
players in auction cant be sold extremely out of market range. Or they will suspect cheats

there would be a fine if a 38/20 avg CF is sold in auction via direct purchase or what not for 10m.


yup. but every day there are auctions where the start price in 20-50m over priced. why wait until someone pays the price? why not fine each listing i suggest that these people are 'closer' to being cheats than people getting players hostiled.
24/05/2012 11:03
  - Div/Gr
     
Go to page 1 ... 2, 3, 4, 5
5