Forum » Off-topic » ROBERTO DI MATTEO SACKED? | Date | |
---|---|---|
Username
1399 msgs.
International
|
i think RDM was a great manager.he was made coach when all seemed lost for chelsea.but he won 2 cups in less than 1 yr for them.Now i see chelsea going nowhere but down the tables in barclays. | 23/11/2012 06:47 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
391 msgs.
First-team player
|
Rdm was a bad coach,chelsea won ucl on luck.current squad is all about individual skills not team play.waiting for Benitez to destroy them completely. | 24/11/2012 08:57 |
- Div/Gr | ||
3547 msgs.
Best scorer
|
bestboss5 said: Rdm was a bad coach,chelsea won ucl on luck.current squad is all about individual skills not team play.waiting for Benitez to destroy them completely. |
24/11/2012 12:51 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
1399 msgs.
International
|
bestboss5 said: Rdm was a bad coach,chelsea won ucl on luck.current squad is all about individual skills not team play.waiting for Benitez to destroy them completely. defeating teams like barcelona and bayern munich and that too in their own stadium cannot be luck..luck will be when chelsea plays a team which has most of its plrs r injured.lol |
24/11/2012 15:47 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
391 msgs.
First-team player
|
Are you trying to tell me that they won due to the genius of RDM or that they were the best in europe?.the only archievement RDM made with chelsea was making the 'park the bus tactic'look like a cup winning plan.chelsea and RDM were bond by luck and it seem to have run out this season. | 24/11/2012 20:20 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
961 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
bestboss5 said: Are you trying to tell me that they won due to the genius of RDM or that they were the best in europe?.the only archievement RDM made with chelsea was making the 'park the bus tactic'look like a cup winning plan.chelsea and RDM were bond by luck and it seem to have run out this season. I agree with this. RDM does not have the managerial caliber to the likes of Pep, Ferguson, etc. as what other well-known teams has he managed? West Brom and MK Dons? You need to remember Andre Villas Boas inherited an aging physical Chelsea team and he wanted them to play slick passing which was unorthodox for that Chelsea side. Once AVB got sacked, RDM used Chelsea to its strengths with the 'parking the bus' tactics. In my opinion, to win that way is so unattractive and anti-football, but it still got the job done against Barca and Bayern. They were extremely lucky to beat the latter teams and RDM won purely due to using Chelsea to its strengths and being there at the right time. With the additions of Oscar, Hazard, and co. Chelsea have been transformed from that physical style to the slick passing AVB wanted. After a few bad matches, RDM is now sacked. This is a testament to Roman's arrogance and stupidity by firing someone who won Chelsea the UCL. How many managers has Chelsea gone through in the last 7 years? 8? To manage that club is surely a minefield lacking any job stability. I'm interested to see how Rafa will handle this Chelsea side. He got the best out of Torres back at Liverpool and won them a UCL back in '05. He's a great tactician, but a horrible manager seeing what he did to Liverpool and Inter. Roman is taking a big gamble on him and it's looking to be a falling down the table for Chelsea. |
24/11/2012 21:32 |
- Div/Gr | ||
3547 msgs.
Best scorer
|
bestboss5 said: Are you trying to tell me that they won due to the genius of RDM or that they were the best in europe?.the only archievement RDM made with chelsea was making the 'park the bus tactic'look like a cup winning plan.chelsea and RDM were bond by luck and it seem to have run out this season. We saw a clear different between Di Matteo and AVB And you're telling me a team cannot have good defense !? Well , if you still say so , i guess some higher power wanted Chelsea to win and Di Matteo to become a Legend |
24/11/2012 22:13 |
- Div/Gr | ||
3547 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Arsenal <3 said: RDM used Chelsea to its strengths with the 'parking the bus' tactics. In my opinion, to win that way is so unattractive and anti-football Anti Football is when 2 team don't make shoot and either end up with 0-0 draw or just 1 goal and the game is boring as Fuk now look back those game of Chelsea, it wasn't Anti Football. Those game could burst your heart out of sheer pressure Di Matteo is Italian , he is surely know how to apply Italy Defensive Tactic . We all know Italy won 4 World Cup with Super Defense , does that mean they're weak or their Coach is an idiot !? |
24/11/2012 22:19 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
961 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
Uruguay1950 said: Arsenal <3 said: RDM used Chelsea to its strengths with the 'parking the bus' tactics. In my opinion, to win that way is so unattractive and anti-football Anti Football is when 2 team don't make shoot and either end up with 0-0 draw or just 1 goal and the game is boring as Fuk now look back those game of Chelsea, it wasn't Anti Football. Those game could burst your heart out of sheer pressure Di Matteo is Italian , he is surely know how to apply Italy Defensive Tactic . We all know Italy won 4 World Cup with Super Defense , does that mean they're weak or their Coach is an idiot !? Anti-football's definition is right here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-football <--- By that definition, Chelsea were indeed playing anti-football especially in that game against Barcelona. I'm not saying it's wrong to play that way, but I find it unattractive. We all have our likes and dislikes in styles of play. You may favor defensive tactics, while I like fast counter attacking football. The anti-football tactics is what bores a majority of people including me, but as long as it's allowed then oh well. I never said Chelsea was weak nor did I ever say RDM was an idiot. I said RDM used Chelsea to its strengths by employing a heavily defensive style and was at the right time to win the UCL hence why he's lucky. Again, all teams play differently: some focus on attack and others focus on defense. I favor the offensive side, while others may like the defensive side. It's fine to support either, but it's not right to insult others for what they like. Edited by Arsenal <3 24-11-2012 22:48 |
24/11/2012 22:46 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
1399 msgs.
International
|
Arsenal <3 said: Uruguay1950 said: Arsenal <3 said: RDM used Chelsea to its strengths with the 'parking the bus' tactics. In my opinion, to win that way is so unattractive and anti-football Anti Football is when 2 team don't make shoot and either end up with 0-0 draw or just 1 goal and the game is boring as Fuk now look back those game of Chelsea, it wasn't Anti Football. Those game could burst your heart out of sheer pressure Di Matteo is Italian , he is surely know how to apply Italy Defensive Tactic . We all know Italy won 4 World Cup with Super Defense , does that mean they're weak or their Coach is an idiot !? Anti-football's definition is right here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-football <--- By that definition, Chelsea were indeed playing anti-football especially in that game against Barcelona. I'm not saying it's wrong to play that way, but I find it unattractive. We all have our likes and dislikes in styles of play. You may favor defensive tactics, while I like fast counter attacking football. The anti-football tactics is what bores a majority of people including me, but as long as it's allowed then oh well. I never said Chelsea was weak nor did I ever say RDM was an idiot. I said RDM used Chelsea to its strengths by employing a heavily defensive style and was at the right time to win the UCL hence why he's lucky. Again, all teams play differently: some focus on attack and others focus on defense. I favor the offensive side, while others may like the defensive side. It's fine to support either, but it's not right to insult others for what they like. Edited by Arsenal < 24-11-2012 22:48 playing ur team to its potential i think is the best a coach can do.coach not only hs to prepare tactics but also motivate his plrs to give their best in a match and that was what RDM did best.we must remember that chelsea were also lagging in barclays and hence their plrs were not happy at all.there were reports of rift between plrs and management.when RDM was made coach he talked to plrs and got the dressing room together. |
25/11/2012 04:26 |
- Div/Gr | ||