Go to page 1, 2
| Forum » Doubts and questions » Training | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
887 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
if it were possible, the developers should make it possible to give individual training to your players | 11/02/2013 17:42 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
6256 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
Its not going to happen doc, the whole game is built around the current way of doing things. If they did that, they would just make it slower to gain points, you would not gain anything from it. |
11/02/2013 17:45 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
6256 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
ajju10 said: @grantis45 said: Dr Obehioye said: i wanna know, if i have players who don't do well in training or decrease with training, is it a good option not to train them? yes it is, if you don't train them, then they don't get worse. One of the reasons I like old GK's. but man........ read what I posted ! & reply pls Dont hijack other peoples threads and I would. |
11/02/2013 17:46 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
887 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
@grantis45 said: ajju10 said: @grantis45 said: Dr Obehioye said: i wanna know, if i have players who don't do well in training or decrease with training, is it a good option not to train them? yes it is, if you don't train them, then they don't get worse. One of the reasons I like old GK's. but man........ read what I posted ! & reply pls Dont hijack other peoples threads and I would. ok grantis lets rationalise this, the goal of training is to produce better players, if players are trained and they decrease and become worse then that training is off no use, one will wonder what sort of philosophy is that |
11/02/2013 18:11 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
6256 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
Dr Obehioye said: @grantis45 said: ajju10 said: @grantis45 said: Dr Obehioye said: i wanna know, if i have players who don't do well in training or decrease with training, is it a good option not to train them? yes it is, if you don't train them, then they don't get worse. One of the reasons I like old GK's. but man........ read what I posted ! & reply pls Dont hijack other peoples threads and I would. ok grantis lets rationalise this, the goal of training is to produce better players, if players are trained and they decrease and become worse then that training is off no use, one will wonder what sort of philosophy is that Go train my 80 year old mother and see how good she gets at football  Also if you dont train you dont gain fitness. So youd end up with all of your old players losing abilities rather than just the ones you aim the training sessions at. What you want is the cake without the poison in it. Your way would see all older players losing abilities rather than just the ones you train. |
11/02/2013 18:16 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Fiscal
6832 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
ajju10 said: Me too in same problem like this ...!! For example - If u have a 20yo CF avg. 56 prog. 89 & u train forward in seniors ! but....there is another CF 25yo avg. 64 & he's decreasing with training so.. If we try to train that 20yo CF ....Then our 25yo CF's avg. decreases !! In this condition........what could be a nice move...!! ? This would also be my answer Whatamidoinghere said: Sell the 25yo guy that's decreasing and get one that can train to replace him with. |
11/02/2013 19:05 |
| Steel City - Div4/Gr64 | ||
|
Username
454 msgs.
First-team player
|
Dr Obehioye said: @grantis45 said: ajju10 said: @grantis45 said: Dr Obehioye said: i wanna know, if i have players who don't do well in training or decrease with training, is it a good option not to train them? yes it is, if you don't train them, then they don't get worse. One of the reasons I like old GK's. but man........ read what I posted ! & reply pls Dont hijack other peoples threads and I would. ok grantis lets rationalise this, the goal of training is to produce better players, if players are trained and they decrease and become worse then that training is off no use, one will wonder what sort of philosophy is that Ok that is why people train one specialized positon in their squad and players In other positions can be aged n still wont get affected |
12/02/2013 14:10 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
728 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
Moodey said: Dr Obehioye said: @grantis45 said: ajju10 said: @grantis45 said: Dr Obehioye said: i wanna know, if i have players who don't do well in training or decrease with training, is it a good option not to train them? yes it is, if you don't train them, then they don't get worse. One of the reasons I like old GK's. but man........ read what I posted ! & reply pls Dont hijack other peoples threads and I would. ok grantis lets rationalise this, the goal of training is to produce better players, if players are trained and they decrease and become worse then that training is off no use, one will wonder what sort of philosophy is that Ok that is why people train one specialized position in their squad and players In other positions can be aged n still wont get affected nice point !! Thanks man......! So......... this clears that we should not train position in which old players are there or the players which decrease by training other players ....................& sell those useless players & buy & train snr young players...!! I didn't get it when eam & whatami told me !  I request @s to close this thread so that no troll could access it ! Edited by ajju10 12-02-2013 15:53 |
12/02/2013 15:52 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
6256 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
It's not your thread to close. You hijacked the doc's one. | 12/02/2013 15:54 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
728 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
so what......!?? We both got the answer, sweet little girl !! |
12/02/2013 15:56 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
Go to page 1, 2
2
