Go to page 1, 2
  Forum » Suggestions » Cross Position similar transfers Date
Username
1835 msgs.
International
Positions like LB/RB; LW/RW; LIM/RIM and so on have similar prices..

Thus i feel in similar transfer of one, both the positions should be shown.. thoughts?
12/04/2013 05:38
  - Div/Gr
3168 msgs.
Best scorer
Agreed. 12/04/2013 16:52
  - Div/Gr
Username
1848 msgs.
International
Yep, agreed. 12/04/2013 18:14
  - Div/Gr
Fiscal
1835 msgs.
International
I agree wholeheartedly, especially because it will make the jobs of fiscals much easier.

To push it one step further, I would propose that we extend the averages that are shown to ~5 points above the players current average and that we include players who are a year older as well. This allows us to predict our value/return over time and allows for more suitable pricing throughout the season (i.e. comparing a 15 year old with similar averaged 16 year olds during the last week of the season).

Great idea!
12/04/2013 20:18
  - Div/Gr
Username
1184 msgs.
International
agreed, never going to happen though. nothing ever does! 13/04/2013 00:17
  - Div/Gr
Username
452 msgs.
First-team player
LeNick said:
agreed, never going to happen though. nothing ever does!


Don't worry. CelloG will make it happen. He always does.
13/04/2013 01:08
  - Div/Gr
Username
15 msgs.
Cadet
It's all fun and games until there's a shortage of specific RIMs, and then somebody gets fined according to LIM similar transfers. 16/04/2013 04:09
  - Div/Gr
Username
373 msgs.
First-team player
Zombiezz said:
It's all fun and games until there's a shortage of specific RIMs, and then somebody gets fined according to LIM similar transfers.



I agree with Dee, some cross positions tend to get sold for more then others
16/04/2013 05:09
  - Div/Gr
Username
4993 msgs.
Best scorer
agreed. great idea.

sometimes you just can't find comparable players. or you find comparable players, but the last sale was 6 months ago. i've made my own searches & used opposing positions to back my case in valuation checks before, but it takes time.
16/04/2013 15:47
  - Div/Gr
Username
4993 msgs.
Best scorer
Heidstra said:
To push it one step further, I would propose that we extend the averages that are shown to ~5 points above the players current average and that we include players who are a year older as well. This allows us to predict our value/return over time and allows for more suitable pricing throughout the season (i.e. comparing a 15 year old with similar averaged 16 year olds during the last week of the season).



^ yes to all this too.

anything that helps build a broader picture should make life easier for the @s and also make the whole system as fair as possible
16/04/2013 15:49
  - Div/Gr
     
Go to page 1, 2
1