Go to page 1
| Forum » Suggestions » Multioffering.... | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Username
21587 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
I noticed this thread recently> http://en.strikermanager.com/foros/foro.php?id=96944 and i dont know whats all about,is it that we now have exchange and multi. Options of transfering players back.i asked.......and i was told that it is just for loan exchange Then,i got a flash back of the real multioffering in which,players are transferred in exchange for each other,then balanced with cash,as the case may be,then,it was a very good option and can still be,but twas abused then,so they removed it.... The mistake then was that managers can finalize the deal without the consent of the @s.....so its very easy to cheat in the sense of helping each other. So my suggestion here is that the so called multioffering should be back in place and strictly monitor by the @s...probably the button to complete the deal is only with them...so,managers will have to wait till the transfer is reviewed and approved....simple...and lets have the fun back,to me,its the best option of transfer..... Getting more work for the @s in other sense,i hate seeing them being idle....lolz... Hear your views.guys.thanks God bless. OYE. ... Edited by Oyewale 10-06-2013 08:26 |
10/06/2013 08:05 |
| 🦊3773™ - Div2/Gr1 | ||
|
Username
3756 msgs.
Best scorer
|
The only reason multi offering was removed was because you could only do so for players under 60 average. With the game being the 10th season it really made no sense whatsoever to keep it. Only a handful of managers in the lower divisions use it. Second problem being is you cannot determine the value of a player simply based on multi offering balancing the players out and adding cash to validate the deal. Progression and forecast matter much more and the system simply cannot decide if a 75 average player with 90 prog is equal in value to a 75 average player with 80 prog. As for making the @s approve it before its allowed, its one and the same thing. You still depend on an @ to make the deal so why not simply ask fiscals about the price of a player and get it over with. Adding work to fiscals makes sense either. @s are regular managers like everyone else except they have a few tools that help monitor the game. They do have a life outside the game and most importantly they do it for free. You simply cannot expect them to stay online 24/7 (though they make it a point that atleast 1 @ be online at any given time of the day). Unless the developers start paying the @s no one is gonna sit here an approve 200+ deals a day. You guys really need to show some respect to these guys. They have real jobs and work 8-9 hrs a day, have a family and still make it a point to spend 2-3 hrs a day and help resolve cases. |
10/06/2013 08:48 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
21587 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
Hmmmm.........but we can have it for high average,now....99ave...it will promote mutual benefit,and make the transfer system real as it is supposed to be,also another option of transfer....since it will be monitored,i see no problem in this. But am sure you saw a "lolz" there luci,yeah....more work for the @s and i will settle them with food from my kitchen....nuts,caviar....etc,just name it  |
10/06/2013 09:40 |
| 🦊3773™ - Div2/Gr1 | ||
|
Fiscal
4046 msgs.
Best scorer
|
lucifercave said: You guys really need to show some respect to these guys. They have real jobs and work 8-9 hrs a day, have a family and still make it a point to spend 2-3 hrs a day and help resolve cases. Oye is aware of this, he wasn't meaning to be disrespectful. |
10/06/2013 10:08 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Fiscal
3449 msgs.
Best scorer
|
You totally still can, it's just that you do two transfer agreements. I think the problem is too the fact that it rarely works out like that. If I want a CDF and I'm selling a CF, their value is so different and the chance that someone has a CDF at the average I want, and wants a CF of the quality I'm selling can be rare. The multi offering forum can be used for this though if it ever comes up, but I just think it's too rare to bother having an actual tool for it. |
10/06/2013 22:30 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
Go to page 1
1
