Go to page 1
| Forum » Suggestions » player of the Round/season | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Username
959 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
Since there's no reward for having a player in the best eleven of the season.....then its useless. My suggestion is that it should be removed or compensate the players/manager even if its on motivation |
25/10/2013 07:53 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
4708 msgs.
Best scorer
|
+1 to that | 25/10/2013 12:50 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
714 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
Good suggestion. +1 | 29/10/2013 02:31 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
527 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
yeah +1 too....at least the player should get few HOF points... | 29/10/2013 10:18 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2149 msgs.
Best scorer
|
I disagree, I will tell you why. The players which get rewarded are not necessarily the best performers. I once had a game where my high avg rdf who barely touched the ball 3 times got highest points, while my RF who scored 4 goals, went unappreciated. Similarly, all the best top eleven might not be the best players, but just got more points because of higher average. I would suggest the devs to first fix the point system and then create a reward for the best ones. |
29/10/2013 11:05 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
959 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
Spade said: I disagree, I will tell you why. The players which get rewarded are not necessarily the best performers. I once had a game where my high avg rdf who barely touched the ball 3 times got highest points, while my RF who scored 4 goals, went unappreciated. Similarly, all the best top eleven might not be the best players, but just got more points because of higher average. I would suggest the devs to first fix the point system and then create a reward for the best ones. Or remove it completely |
29/10/2013 11:18 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3880 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Spade said: I disagree, I will tell you why. The players which get rewarded are not necessarily the best performers. I once had a game where my high avg rdf who barely touched the ball 3 times got highest points, while my RF who scored 4 goals, went unappreciated. Similarly, all the best top eleven might not be the best players, but just got more points because of higher average. I would suggest the devs to first fix the point system and then create a reward for the best ones. Agreed, the MVP should be the player who played the most above his actual average (example an 85av LF gets a rating of 79 and a 70av RDF gets a rating of 78, the RDF should have an MVP score of +8 and the LF an MVP score of -7 therefore the RDF should be MVP) |
29/10/2013 22:30 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
280 msgs.
First-team player
|
@bowsey1986 said: Spade said: I disagree, I will tell you why. The players which get rewarded are not necessarily the best performers. I once had a game where my high avg rdf who barely touched the ball 3 times got highest points, while my RF who scored 4 goals, went unappreciated. Similarly, all the best top eleven might not be the best players, but just got more points because of higher average. I would suggest the devs to first fix the point system and then create a reward for the best ones. Agreed, the MVP should be the player who played the most above his actual average (example an 85av LF gets a rating of 79 and a 70av RDF gets a rating of 78, the RDF should have an MVP score of +8 and the LF an MVP score of -7 therefore the RDF should be MVP) @bowsey1986, we need to have the ratings fixed, though. In real life terms, a player who scores a hat trick in a 3-0 win will get man-of-the-match awards 9 times out of 10. In SM it is usually more likely to go to a defender or midfielder. In your example with the LF and RDF, it is a very real possibility that the LF would get a 79 rating even though he scored a hat trick. For example, in my friendly today, my 69 rated CF scored 4 goals and got given a 74 rating while my 84 rated RIM scored once and got a 96 rating. In my mind, scoring 4 goals should be worthy of a better rating than a 74. |
29/10/2013 22:48 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
Go to page 1
1
