Go to page 1, 2, 3
  Forum » Suggestions » School produce nonesense Date
Username
4257 msgs.
Best scorer
can someone delete this thread? i dont want a dev passing by and reading this ! he will think schools produce good progression players! 07/11/2013 17:34
  - Div/Gr
3168 msgs.
Best scorer
akleb said:
can someone delete this thread? i dont want a dev passing by and reading this ! he will think schools produce good progression players!


That's not going go happen.
08/11/2013 11:42
  - Div/Gr
1734 msgs.
International
akleb said:
you only suggested that because you have only one school , if you had a few more , you wouldn't even suggested that ! that very selfish of u!!

btw schools barely produce any good player , you should suggest that school produce high progression players more often !


Do you have an account on the spanish server??
08/11/2013 19:37
  - Div/Gr
1734 msgs.
International
akleb said:
90+ progression players in ES wasn't because of school , it was just because of alot of 90 progression +search


Completely wrong, you need schools to make 90+ prog and 90+ FC, the 90+ where introduced because there was a superavit of money, and now we've got a superavit of 90+ players.
08/11/2013 19:39
  - Div/Gr
1734 msgs.
International
Jurgen Kloppy said:
i suggest that schools should produce low prog players, in-order for this server not to be like the spanish server .

Ideas?


+1

Schools should be much more expensive to build(300-500 millions) and much more expensive to mantain ( 5-50 million per week)
08/11/2013 19:42
  - Div/Gr
Username
959 msgs.
MVP of the game
Botaya1 said:
Jurgen Kloppy said:
i suggest that schools should produce low prog players, in-order for this server not to be like the spanish server .

Ideas?


+1

Schools should be much more expensive to build(300-500 millions) and much more expensive to mantain ( 5-50 million per week)

-10000000 it will unbalance the economy of SM if this is the case, players will be wayyyyyy expensive because the managers must recover the money spent on weekly maintenance by selling player on a high note, the rich will only get richer and the poor poorer because the poor wouldn't be able to afford school player or any good player at all, you wouldn't want to buy a junior for 20m and sell for 2.5m when his average is 40 would you?
08/11/2013 20:16
  - Div/Gr
1734 msgs.
International
Abaxido said:
Botaya1 said:
Jurgen Kloppy said:
i suggest that schools should produce low prog players, in-order for this server not to be like the spanish server .

Ideas?


+1

Schools should be much more expensive to build(300-500 millions) and much more expensive to mantain ( 5-50 million per week)

-10000000 it will unbalance the economy of SM if this is the case, players will be wayyyyyy expensive because the managers must recover the money spent on weekly maintenance by selling player on a high note, the rich will only get richer and the poor poorer because the poor wouldn't be able to afford school player or any good player at all, you wouldn't want to buy a junior for 20m and sell for 2.5m when his average is 40 would you?


There would be less schools... This story has already happened in the spanish server, please try to learn from the mistakes made in the past.
08/11/2013 20:21
  - Div/Gr
Username
959 msgs.
MVP of the game
Botaya1 said:
please try to learn from the mistakes made in the past.

That doesn't mean we have to destroy the future
08/11/2013 20:41
  - Div/Gr
Fiscal
4207 msgs.
Best scorer
As it is there are a ton of posts on this server about schools being a complete waste of money because they ARE expensive and produce little.

It seems that people forget that once a school produces a 90+ player it still takes many seasons for them to get to 90+ avg....which means well over a year's playing time.

10/11/2013 04:51
  FC need more holidays - Div4/Gr7
Username
3756 msgs.
Best scorer
Its been over 32 months since I had excellent schools and in this time the only 90+ prog players I have got are

93 prog 14 yr old RF
91 prog 14 yr old Gk
90 prog 14 yr old LIM

Around 4-6 85+ prog. Rest of the time all I get is crap players. I have even got a 47 prog player on more than one occasion from my Brazil excellent school. 99% of the time I get players between 66 and 77 prog. Every few weeks I end up discarding these players since no one even buys them when I put them up for auctions from $0.

Most of my schools havent even paid for themselves yet.

So the idea of making schools produce more nonsense than what I already get is bad in my opinion.
10/11/2013 06:57
  - Div/Gr
     
Go to page 1, 2, 3
2