Go to page 1
| Forum » Doubts and questions » what about DFM | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Username
65 msgs.
Rookie
|
Hi guys! I'm thinking of changing my IM for a good DFM. But I noticed that DFM's are very expensive compared to IM's. Would it be a good choice to switch to a tactic with DFM in it or is it a waste of money? Grtz |
03/04/2014 17:45 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Fiscal
4210 msgs.
Best scorer
|
There isn't a general answer about that. DFM's are more defensive than IM's. If you are looking to add to your defense, then yes. Your IM is going to be more offensive. It just depends on how you choose to focus your formation. |
03/04/2014 22:22 |
| FC need more holidays - Div3/Gr9 | ||
|
Username
1265 msgs.
International
|
Tommos said: Hi guys! I'm thinking of changing my IM for a good DFM. But I noticed that DFM's are very expensive compared to IM's. Would it be a good choice to switch to a tactic with DFM in it or is it a waste of money? Grtz It depends of what you need to improve. Generally speaking, defensive power, DFM, attack power, IM. Even you can get a DFM playing like an IM with certaing parameters and an IM playing like a DFM with certain parameters too, by creating an advanced tactic to solve your need in a specific way. About prices, DFM's usually are more expensive than IM's, but having both high average, p.e. +85, they roughly are equally expensive. Edited by The Red Fury 04-04-2014 14:17 |
04/04/2014 14:16 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1184 msgs.
International
|
Technically speaking an IM is the middle ground between OM and DFM because if trained properly an IM can have high tackling. Just many people training IM are to lazy to do it  I'm not a fan of DFM my self I find they are a bit like a deer in headlights when they have the ball. |
04/04/2014 15:09 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
65 msgs.
Rookie
|
Thnx for all your responses! I'm going to think about my tactics now  |
04/04/2014 15:27 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
Go to page 1
1
