Go to page 1, 2
| Forum » Suggestions » Player inclusion in transfer dealings | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Username
1212 msgs.
International
|
I would suggest a new system of transfer agreement like player inclusion in the deal to be adopted with the market value of such a player being fixed by the @s to enable managers spend less during transfers. The manager who is to sell will now have the final say to whether he accepts or not. | 21/06/2014 17:35 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3439 msgs.
Best scorer
|
There was something like this some seasons ago until it was scrapped because the system couldn't regulate the transfers. http://en.strikermanager.com/wiki/index.php?title=MULTIOFERTAS If a particular feature has been extinguished from Striker's system, it's definitely not coming back! |
22/06/2014 09:46 |
| PSG - Div3/Gr10 | ||
|
Username
1212 msgs.
International
|
What they only need 2 regulate is d market value of the player being offered. Eg Manager A wants to purchase Lin Anderson from manager B. Lin Anderson has a release clause of 50 Million, Manager A has 30 Million in his account. If Manager A applies for such a transfer and Manager B accepts to go into negotiation with him, the @s would then send a message to Manager A notifying of the players in his squad that have a market value of 20M and above. Manager A after receiving this message, he would then decide which of the players he would include in the deal. | 22/06/2014 19:38 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3439 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Edited by Ali Agharabi 22-06-2014 20:19 |
22/06/2014 20:15 |
| PSG - Div3/Gr10 | ||
|
Username
3439 msgs.
Best scorer
|
rexmilan said: ... the @s would then send a message to Manager A notifying of the players in his squad ... Have pity on the @'s, O Rex!  They'd be sending a thousand messages if this is the case. |
22/06/2014 20:18 |
| PSG - Div3/Gr10 | ||
|
Username
3756 msgs.
Best scorer
|
If U Play agrees to pay me $15k a month to do this work I dont mind sitting all day at home and approving prices and dealing with endless reports. If your idea goes through either the @s will quit or we will need another 40 @s or as per my idea U Play pays us for our service since we will have to quit our jobs (or be kicked out from our jobs for playing the game during working hrs).  Edited by @lucifercave 22-06-2014 20:41 |
22/06/2014 20:40 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1212 msgs.
International
|
That would be a personal negotiation between u guys and U PLAY @LUCIFERCAVE. I believe developing the game more is more important to them than the workers salary. | 23/06/2014 10:48 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3439 msgs.
Best scorer
|
rexmilan said: I believe developing the game more is more important to them than the workers salary. Nope. As long as goalkeepers still put the ball into their own nets, it shows that the game is not "developing", and consequently, the devs won't be able to pay financial attention to fiscals. We haven't received developmental updates in a while, have we? Edited by Ali Agharabi 23-06-2014 12:43 |
23/06/2014 12:25 |
| PSG - Div3/Gr10 | ||
|
Username
5633 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
rexmilan said: That would be a personal negotiation between u guys and U PLAY @LUCIFERCAVE. I believe developing the game more is more important to them than the workers salary. Dude the thing is we don't get paid to do this. In any case, I think U-play would prefer the transfer process to me as simple as possible and this adds a lot of complexity. I can see your point though and in a situation where complexity/effort wasn't a problem this idea might have more weight. |
23/06/2014 12:32 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3756 msgs.
Best scorer
|
rexmilan said: That would be a personal negotiation between u guys and U PLAY @LUCIFERCAVE. I believe developing the game more is more important to them than the workers salary. The only way U Play will agree to pay us is if they make the game a paid version ONLY. So the question is are you ready to pay for the game? |
23/06/2014 14:57 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
Go to page 1, 2
1
