@illex said:
I think this is what's causing the problems, every game ever will be a draw at some point, so that tactic is always sitting there unsure when it wants to trigger. The game you got mad about was because this tactic was still sort of looming there. Personally anymore I go with simple time based tactics where my effort increases at 60 min and subs come on. I'm still able to play full stamina players every game.

What you've done here is simply put too many variables into play, and when you have all those variables theres much more of a chance of failure

Edited by @illex 09-11-2014 15:18

Strahovuk said:

Wrong. Seems to me that my English isn't simple enough.

Strahovuk said:

I'm playing several seasons practically same set of advanced orders - including that one "when draw, then do that" - and that works, I repeat, WORKS FINE! - in most matches!
Why draw? Because if I score, I want my effort to go lower ("zalaganje" means effort), but if opponent scores, I want my team to push again with starting effort. Again, THAT WORKS FINE and there is no reason why shouldn't.

Strahovuk said:
Putting aside "2 or more time defined orders" bug which we already found that trigger EVERY time when there is more than one order with specified minute in it (and Bowsey is only one who don't have problems with it as far as I know) - I found several other situations at other teams when subs fails even when there is no time defined order at all.

Strahovuk said:And I'm not mad at that specific match. I'm mad at crapy support. And it is crappy because this here is just our wild guessing and there is neither one word from programmer why the hell that thing isn't never fixed (as I heard, that bug was reported years ago and there was no answer, never).
I don't see any use of wild guessing which, in best case, leads to some childish workaround which anyone can find by himself without losing time at forum repeating the same thing dozens times.
Just please pass the question - do they have any intention to support this game or not. And if they do, when they will finally learn some coding to be able to fix anything.
Thank you.

bowsey1986 said:


Firstly acting like a dick to people who are only trying to help you is very petty



If it worked FINE then it would always work and not just most of the time and you would not be here ranting. I hate to sound like a broken record but if you cannot see what I am talking about with conflicting tactics then i just give up. At 60 mins there were 2 tactics that could have been implemented your anytime draw and your subs. Because there were 2 options the system chooses one (from my experience it is random which one is chosen), I had the same problem as you for a while and i dropped all situational tactics and it sorted it. You call my explanation guesswork and yes it is to an extent as i do not work for UPLAY but it is also based on experience.


I do not appreciate the sarcasm as if i am in denial about my tactics, if you ask anyone who uses advanced tactics the way i do they will tell you the same thing, they ALWAYS work. Simplicity is your friend in this instance my tactics are (30mins up effort) - (45 mins lower effort) - (60 mins up effort, 3 subs and a formation change) Because I have only 1 advanced tactic for any particular time in the game they ALWAYS work.




I do agree that the lack of clarity from the devs on a few aspects of the game is frustrating but at the end of the day they are a small business with a lot more games/projects to juggle too. And this game is totally free for everyone (yes i know you have to buy GBs but you can get those free too and GBs are not needed to improve) and is IMO the best online management game out there by a mile even with its flaws. One reason why I think this is because there are always people willing to help others for no personal gain.


You have been here long enough to know that doubts and questions are not answered by developers, if you were going to dismiss anyones help who was not a dev then why would you even bother asking. Next time you have an issue that you are sure none of use guessing morons can answer then email the devs info@strikermanager.com I'm sure they will get straight back to you and be as helpful as myself and illex were trying to be

YAMAKASY IN DA HOUSE said:
Do not waste your time with this game, of grief functions.

It's a tease, you see games where teams lose to teams half 85/88 against half 70. Players playing field goalkeeping and goalkeepers with half of 50 or 60, against 87 others, and winning the game. Players running out of energy more that the they have the power to maximum and just entering the pitch. Teams with hardly skills winning teams with lots of skills and winning easily.

And you hope that after this summary of regrettable simulator performance, advanced function properly? lol

@illex said:
If you want to know @'s don't have any contact with actual developers, just people who are project managers who then talk to devs about issues.

They pass along the issue and it probably gets added to a list of 200 other things they have to do and unless its something bad it probably gets pushed to the bottom never to be touched.

People from uplay have appeared here in the forum maybe 3-4 times in the time I've been here.

As bowsey said simple tactics are better. I've tried running something like what you have and at the end of the day I don't think there is much gain.