Go to page 1, 2
  Forum » General » How many developers are working on SIM? Date
Username
1058 msgs.
International
 Is the development of sim dead after the start of 3D version of this game?

The sim has very very bad bugs. Will they ever spend some time to improve the sim to enjoy it like real football.

I'm not blaming the game. I am just suggesting that it can be improved. Just like how the features related to transfer market is improving. In the end it's all about the game you see with your eyes. 		25/05/2015 16:43
  - Div/Gr
Username
3765 msgs.
Best scorer
 You're right, Many Users keep on complaining about the Sim and to this we don't usually enjoy the Sim just like before. The Dev should fix the Sim... #FixTheSim. 25/05/2015 22:30
  - Div/Gr
Fiscal
4046 msgs.
Best scorer
 How many extra GB per year would you expect to pay to ensure the bugs were fixed? 25/05/2015 23:13
  - Div/Gr
Username
3066 msgs.
Best scorer
sicox86 said:
How many extra GB per year would you expect to pay to ensure the bugs were fixed?


Although I get your point, that is not completely fair statment. Not to mention that improvement of the sim might and probably would attract many new players that would spend additional gb's


Edited by ForzaJuve! 25-05-2015 23:49 		25/05/2015 23:48
  - Div/Gr
Fiscal
4046 msgs.
Best scorer
ForzaJuve! said:
sicox86 said:
How many extra GB per year would you expect to pay to ensure the bugs were fixed?


Although I get ypur point, that is not completely fair statment. Not to mention that improvement of the sim might and probably would attract many new players that would spend additional gb's

It's not intended to denounce their argument, and it's a pertinent question - the answer to which I'm sure the devs would be interested in.
I've no doubt a better sim, especially for mobile users, would attract more users. However, I wonder how much of the improvements people would expect for free and how much people would expect any developments to be worth to an individual user. If the answer could be 'proven' to be 0, no updates are 'deserved', if 100, for example, per active user, they may be able to correct some unattractive glitches, and if the answer is 10000 they'd better start making a new sim.
Just for fixing the bugs I'd pay up to 1000 extra in GB each year, but that's me personally. 		25/05/2015 23:57
  - Div/Gr
Username
3066 msgs.
Best scorer
 That is not exactly how that works, but I get your point.
Anyway, they can always send us a survey to see where active players are with the spendings and would they spend more if additional improvements were to be added......

Edited by ForzaJuve! 26-05-2015 00:12 		26/05/2015 00:09
  - Div/Gr
Fiscal
4046 msgs.
Best scorer
ForzaJuve! said:
That is not exactly how that works, but I get your point.

Well, how does it work, in your view?
I think witty has asked a good question, albeit not quite how I'd have put it. I'm interested to see if the devs plan on improving this version of the game, but I'm also aware that many users think this should be provided for free. It could be a good investment if it attracts more paying users, but only if it's worth the devs' time in doing so. What, in your opinion, am I missing here? 		26/05/2015 00:15
  - Div/Gr
Username
3066 msgs.
Best scorer
sicox86 said:
ForzaJuve! said:
That is not exactly how that works, but I get your point.

Well, how does it work, in your view?
I think witty has asked a good question, albeit not quite how I'd have put it. I'm interested to see if the devs plan on improving this version of the game, but I'm also aware that many users think this should be provided for free. It could be a good investment if it attracts more paying users, but only if it's worth the devs' time in doing so. What, in your opinion, am I missing here?


I don't want to write long post and give complicated explenations at this hour, but it is rather simple.
Improvements - more potential users

No improvements - less potential users

Some of them will spend, some won't. It all boils down to this; can they make good sim with small (worthwile) effort. And get rid of the bugs.


And as I said, they can make a survey to see if it is worth to them to go that way as it is atm.


Edited by ForzaJuve! 26-05-2015 00:28 		26/05/2015 00:26
  - Div/Gr
Fiscal
4046 msgs.
Best scorer
 Well, this isn't entirely how it is going to work for U-Play either (no need for any degree of pragmatism at this hour), but I get your point.

More users is not the same as more money for the devs with which to re-invest in the game and its features. Throw in enough developments which cost more to implement than the revenue increase they generate and this game will come to an end all the sooner.

Surveys would be a nice touch, no doubt, I'd take part, but I'd be sceptical of the quality of the results reading the suggestions forum. That place can be mind boggling.

Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see a more users, a better sim, fewer bugs, a nicer mobile interface, better translations and a prettier layout, but I'm also aware that U-Play is only going to provide any of these if it can see a benefit to us and to them.

Edited by sicox86 26-05-2015 00:44 		26/05/2015 00:44
  - Div/Gr
Username
3066 msgs.
Best scorer
 Meh, having a game as it is shows to players that basically you are investing money at own risk....they have DOID link on main page advertising the "best game award" for 2009 that leads to blank page......
I would like to know how many players reduced their spendings out of uncertainity will the game be here in say a month.
Now, if that is inevitable to happen, let it happen. But if they can have 1 good guy to tackle the problems of the game and make it more appealing to current and future users it can only benefit them, not hurt them......

Unless the ship has already sailed if you get what I mean.
Having the game stagnant send exactly that message. And they can not expect increased revenue with that politic.

Edited by ForzaJuve! 26-05-2015 00:59

Edited by ForzaJuve! 26-05-2015 01:12 		26/05/2015 00:57
  - Div/Gr
     
Go to page 1, 2
1