Go to page 1
  Forum » Suggestions » WE DEMAND CHANGE Date
Username
181 msgs.
Substitute
SM is fastly dying under the watch of invisible and uninterested authority. the game is intensively suffering. Mismanagement, errors, bug attack, abusive power sharing, lack of care and maintenance, poor communication, outdated nature, ingame out of control, sarcastic result, formation abuse, tactics dwindling and many more. we demand change. this our time, energy and money.
#wedemandchange
#getSMback
#AbetterSMweneed

Edited by EL WILSY 04-06-2020 15:52
04/06/2020 15:21
  - Div/Gr
Username
21587 msgs.
Golden Ball
So what exactly do you suggest we do about it?
How do we get that better SM?
Do you have any plan or step to follow?
I'm totally in support of this...
05/06/2020 03:11
  🦊3773™ - Div2/Gr1
Username
181 msgs.
Substitute
Compare this game with other football manager platform, you will notice lack of organisation, no fun, runaway managers. we need to understand that football in reality has changed. so do this game need change. a define policy on every aspect of the game 05/06/2020 17:28
  - Div/Gr
Fiscal
4046 msgs.
Best scorer
EL WILSY said:
Compare this game with other football manager platform, you will notice lack of organisation, no fun, runaway managers. we need to understand that football in reality has changed. so do this game need change. a define policy on every aspect of the game

I look forward to receiving a copy of your policy.
05/06/2020 18:28
  - Div/Gr
Username
181 msgs.
Substitute
Some aspect demand changes like;
1. make absolute revolution on FORMATION. that article has been abused. basic, advance it doesn't exist in real life. we should get it straight and not creating rubbish. that will call for hardwork fr6 manager and knowing their development direction.

2.A controlled schematic approach towards transfer. there should be either a season for it or a limited number created per season. managers loose player when it really seems they are finding their feet.

3. An improved sim. the current sim has been for many season and visually has lost taste.

4. A communication route to managers on how game is run, maintained, update and problem attacked.

5. Bugs complain has become an anthem on this platform and it seems nothing is done to combat.

6. An easy design of the site for greater compactibility, accessibility, and ease of control by managers.

7. Tactical tweak. too many protocol, newbies find it hard to understand and relate with the setting and arrangement.
05/06/2020 20:35
  - Div/Gr
Fiscal
4046 msgs.
Best scorer
EL WILSY said:
...

OK, cool, we're off to a start.
I see a lot more words here than pure suggestions, but from what I understand, your suggestion is the following:


1) Revolutionise formations

I think you are suggesting the current setup is not realistic. Be specific, what changes would you suggest?


2) Transfers

I can see one suggestion is for a limited number of transfers each season. Some management games limit, one way or another, how many players you can have on auction at the same time. What benefits would this bring?
Otherwise, the remainder of this suggestion is not clear.


3) Improved simulator

I agree, the current sim is not as attractive as it could be in a perfect world. What changes would you suggest?


4) Communication between developers and users

Personally, I cannot yet see the merits of a report into how the game is run and maintained. Can you explain why this would help you to enjoy the game more?
As for updates to the game - yes, there have been multiple times where these could have been better communicated.
I do not understand what you mean by "problem attacked".


5) Bug complaints

Understood. What would you suggest to combat the occurrence of bugs?


6) Redesign of the site

There could be value in a redesign of the site for ease of use, yes.
What specific suggestions would you have to improve:

- Compatibility (and what do you mean by this?)
- Accessibility
- Ease of control? (and what do you mean by this?)


7) Tactical tweaks

I think I understand what you mean here. What, specifically, would you change to make it easier for new users to get to grips with the game?


If I have understood your suggestions correctly, many would require development to the game. How would you propose this is funded?

Edited by @sicox86 05-06-2020 21:15
05/06/2020 21:13
  - Div/Gr
Username
177 msgs.
Substitute
Bruv,

People like complaining, but no one wants to actually either put in the effort to think things through and present a solid plan on how improving specific things would lead to higher XYZ, or understand the budget/fund constraints. Plus, When you ask them about this, they don't even reply. Why waste your breath on this?
21/06/2020 22:52
  - Div/Gr
Username
17 msgs.
Cadet
I am in total support of this you can image my player vote sentoof for stepping on referee which player will do such nonsense intentionally hahaha. Offside number greater than total short yet according to my tactics my forward aren't to move deep.
Some time I imagine if the authority is the one deciding who win and who lose and not base on team performance and quality. Seriously I have experience alot since I join strikers I just try to endure because of my love for football.
Pls the authorities help try and adjust it.
24/06/2020 16:39
  - Div/Gr
Username
17 msgs.
Cadet

"A controlled schematic approach towards transfer. there should be either a season for it or a limited number created per season. managers loose player when it really seems they are finding their feet."
I support this suggestions for instance specify transfer periods for senior players, (like transfer market for players open before season start and before we start second leg of league match).we can keep auction of players on but that will be for junior players since they can't directly affect the strength of the senior team.
You will be thinking "what about junior players with high rating like 70 and above since a team can buy player with such ability and directly promote them"
That is also possible and that is why I will also suggest that how junior players under age 16 should be train in school and once they are 16 we can then promote them to junior team by signing professional contrat and transfer policy applicable to senior also applicable to them. Teams or manager can reach transfer agreement during non transfer periods but players join in the next transfer period
25/06/2020 14:39
  - Div/Gr
Fiscal
4046 msgs.
Best scorer
Gelson Smith said:

...

Hi Gelson.
Before we go into details, can you outline the benefit(s) your approach, and how this development should be funded?
Thanks.
25/06/2020 16:22
  - Div/Gr
     
Go to page 1
1