| Forum » Suggestions » BUY BACK OF PLAYERS | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Username
1212 msgs.
International
|
I want to suggest that BUY BACK should be included in transfer dealings to enable a manager purchase his own player after some seasons if he needs him. Like i sell a player for 5million nd if i am to buy him back, I should be ready to pay like 7.5 million and above depending on his current average i.e the higher the average the higher the BUY BACK CLAUSE and this would not be applicable to other managers because they have to either pay his release clause or wait for him to be auctioned. | 07/08/2013 19:20 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Fiscal
3449 msgs.
Best scorer
|
So you want to be able to sell a player, allow someone to train it, and then get a nice deal on the player? | 07/08/2013 19:24 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1212 msgs.
International
|
The managers get rewarded with cash for the training. | 07/08/2013 19:27 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3756 msgs.
Best scorer
|
You can do that but you need to buy the player at market value. You simply cant sell a junior player who is 35 average for 5m and then after 3 seasons when he is 70-80 average buy him back at 10m. You need to pay the amount based on the market value and most importantly with approval from fiscals. |
07/08/2013 19:31 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1212 msgs.
International
|
That is why i said "depending on his current average" | 07/08/2013 19:39 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3756 msgs.
Best scorer
|
So whats the suggestion then? You can buy back players but you need a fiscal approval first. | 07/08/2013 19:50 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1212 msgs.
International
|
Yea but the essence of fiscal is just to fix the market value that's all. | 07/08/2013 19:54 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Fiscal
4046 msgs.
Best scorer
|
So I buy your 5m player at market value, and you have the right to buy him back at market value at a later date. Would it be like a hostile, so I would have no choice but to let the player leave within 24 hours? What is different with this suggestion to what is already possible? Say if I then sell the player to a different manager, do you still have the same right to re-buy, given that you never made the contract with the player's new manager? I can see what you're aiming for, I just want to know a little more what your suggestion would offer the game. |
07/08/2013 20:43 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1212 msgs.
International
|
This is how it will work. I sell my player with average of 40 for 5 Million and after four seasons with another manager he becomes a 65 averaged player, then fiscal(s) will then determine the buy back clause for that player considering his present average, stats, age and others and the buy back for that player would be less than the release clause. This BUY BACK option would only be visible to the manager that sold him. Then if the player is been sold to another team before the BUY BACK is applied, then the BUY BACK expires. | 07/08/2013 20:54 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
961 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
rexmilan said: This is how it will work. I sell my player with average of 40 for 5 Million and after four seasons with another manager he becomes a 65 averaged player, then fiscal(s) will then determine the buy back clause for that player considering his present average, stats, age and others and the buy back for that player would be less than the release clause. This BUY BACK option would only be visible to the manager that sold him. Then if the player is been sold to another team before the BUY BACK is applied, then the BUY BACK expires. There's no point in having such a feature when you can freely transfer any player with any manager as so long as both meet the market value of a player. That same scenario can be followed like this: You sell your player to me for 5 million, after four seasons you ask to buy him back from me. We set a price that the fiscals approve, then I sell him back to you. If I was to sell him to another manager, then you could ask him to buy that said player back. There is no point in this buy back clause as you can already do that in game. What you're suggesting is only a feature that would limit transfers and is already allowable with even more freedom. I don't see how this can be useful, but only a disadvantage. |
07/08/2013 21:20 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
1
