Forum » General » deflation | Date | |
---|---|---|
Username
1772 msgs.
International
|
erm i notice lots of managers now with 100m weekly expenses now just how do thety stay afloat ? and wont they run out of cash and force sales thus mass deflation soon - esp we lost 1000 managers this last month alone |
16/07/2014 00:39 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
5633 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
You gotta make a couple of sales, keep money in deposits to offset some. 1.3B in deposits will net about 7 mil in interest per week. Typically teams that have expenses like that can raise that kind of money quite quickly. That's what I do anyway |
16/07/2014 04:14 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Fiscal
4046 msgs.
Best scorer
|
@practicesquad said: You gotta make a couple of sales, keep money in deposits to offset some. 1.3B in deposits will net about 7 mil in interest per week. Typically teams that have expenses like that can raise that kind of money quite quickly. That's what I do anyway Interesting. But to be clear, it does enforce player sales too, right? |
16/07/2014 08:51 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
1772 msgs.
International
|
thanx good replys so its as i thought its just unsustainable |
16/07/2014 11:06 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
5633 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
sicox86 said: @practicesquad said: You gotta make a couple of sales, keep money in deposits to offset some. 1.3B in deposits will net about 7 mil in interest per week. Typically teams that have expenses like that can raise that kind of money quite quickly. That's what I do anyway Interesting. But to be clear, it does enforce player sales too, right? It does, however as players get around 26-27 they become cheaper to keep, so in time fortunes change, you just have to manage it for a bit. I'm sure real football clubs go through similar problems. I like the challenge personally |
16/07/2014 13:11 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Fiscal
4046 msgs.
Best scorer
|
@practicesquad said: sicox86 said: @practicesquad said: You gotta make a couple of sales, keep money in deposits to offset some. 1.3B in deposits will net about 7 mil in interest per week. Typically teams that have expenses like that can raise that kind of money quite quickly. That's what I do anyway Interesting. But to be clear, it does enforce player sales too, right? It does, however as players get around 26-27 they become cheaper to keep, so in time fortunes change, you just have to manage it for a bit. I'm sure real football clubs go through similar problems. I like the challenge personally Thanks. I have sometimes wondered how the big clubs managed, but did not factor in the drop in RCs at the age you said. Not like it will ever concern me |
16/07/2014 13:21 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
5339 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
Deposits suck. Real football clubs don't pay all their spends only with deposits. Edited by SuTaGar 16-07-2014 19:50 |
16/07/2014 18:10 |
A - Div2/Gr4 | ||
Username
1772 msgs.
International
|
no its worst itrw its now the norm to buy any public listed club using the clubs own money!! man u case and point - they bought a club cash and asset rich using a 'bridging loan' asap they own the club - they borrow against the club to pay back bridging loan now they own a club all be it with massive depts having not risked a penny of own money this world makes me sick |
16/07/2014 19:39 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
476 msgs.
First-team player
|
superkrapper said: no its worst itrw its now the norm to buy any public listed club using the clubs own money!! man u case and point - they bought a club cash and asset rich using a 'bridging loan' asap they own the club - they borrow against the club to pay back bridging loan now they own a club all be it with massive depts having not risked a penny of own money this world makes me sick man u make me sick |
16/07/2014 21:16 |
- Div/Gr | ||
Username
5633 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
superkrapper said: no its worst itrw its now the norm to buy any public listed club using the clubs own money!! man u case and point - they bought a club cash and asset rich using a 'bridging loan' asap they own the club - they borrow against the club to pay back bridging loan now they own a club all be it with massive depts having not risked a penny of own money this world makes me sick I would say that's wise business management. Companies do things like this all the time, they can now pay off that bridging loan with the income from 2 clubs, and if the venture fails, the primary business is unaffected. As if you wouldn't do that Edit: also I'm pretty sure it wasn't man u that bought the club but some of the ex-players. Correct me if I'm wrong... Edited by @practicesquad 17-07-2014 06:38 |
17/07/2014 06:33 |
- Div/Gr | ||