| Forum » General » -20% avg Rule Poll | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Do you agree with the -20%avg rule for free-gained players during inter-season?
|
||
|
Username
280 msgs.
First-team player
|
nowen said: I just want to ask one thing. In real world, if the contract of the player ends, he is free to go any team at no cost other than salary which wud be offered to him. So, if these players are without team in market, so who is getting the money from their auction..?? ADMIN..?? Now, thats a gud way devised by admin to earn more for their teams. Admin guys, your job is to make game more realistic and by auctioning teamless players in market you are driving the game away from that. Secondly if you can see, these 287 managers are the ones who are making this game fun for Striker Manager by remaining active. you have taken this decision for those 18000 who are ready to leave at any time. Thats how you pay back to these loyal 287 managers. We have spent money to get high rating point coaching secretary and he is doing his job well by bringing in unsigned good players for the team. Ask those 18000 of yours to pay more for their coaching secretary. In the end, I just want to reiterate my first point, in real world, players whose contract gets finished and not renewed by their team are free to go to any team. You can not put a price on them. That was not bug, that was the right thing. In the real world, messi will never be sold by 0€. But, even if it were, this is not the real world. This is a football game, and we have to work so the game is fair for everyone. Getting a whole new squad at 0€ is not something we like to see, it really takes very little skill to do that. This is a long term game, that should benefit the best manager, not the lucky one who was in the good moment at the correct spot, so he could get the best team in the game for free. If we do nothing, we'll be jeopardizing the fun of the game. There would be a few guys, that will be the best teams in the game, for at least 5 or 6 years. DO you really want this? 1 day effort and you are the best of the game for 6 years? definitely not. I understand your position, of course i do, but i have to watch over the future of this game, and it's obvious that the best team of the game cannot be done in 1 day. It's a process of months and months, not 1 day. Edited by @Rand 20-06-2011 18:08 |
20/06/2011 18:05 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
45 msgs.
Child's coach
|
If Cristiano.Ronaldo got his team retained for 72 hours for what he said, this is no different. There is no need to use language like that in the forum! Please stay on the topic, don't go crying, and try to ban people... This will help nobody, just ignore it |
20/06/2011 18:06 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
5569 msgs.
Golden Ball
|
In the real world, if *messi's contract expired* or he was released by the team, he would be sold for 0. That's what people are failing to realize AUCTION INVALIDATES RELEASE CLAUSE. If a player comes off of auction with no owner, then he has no release clause. *Exactly the same as a newly generated youth* There was no bug. Only expected and realistic behavior. The *MISTAKE* was voiding all of the contracts at once, then expecting everything to turn out great. |
20/06/2011 18:10 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1848 msgs.
International
|
paus united said: If Cristiano.Ronaldo got his team retained for 72 hours for what he said, this is no different. There is no need to use language like that in the forum! Please stay on the topic, don't go crying, and try to ban people... This will help nobody, just ignore it - Any insult to another user, fiscal, moderator or to the administration may result in immediate and irrevocable expulsion from the game. Its in the forum rules, and there really is no need for it. |
20/06/2011 18:12 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
221 msgs.
Substitute
|
@Rand said: If we do nothing, we'll be jeopardizing the fun of the game. There would be a few guys, that will be the best teams in the game, for at least 5 or 6 years. DO you really want this? 1 day effort and you are the best of the game for 6 years? definitely not. I understand your position, of course i do, but i have to watch over the future of this game, and it's obvious that the best team of the game cannot be done in 1 day. It's a process of months and months, not 1 day. Than you should remove sponsorpacks as well. When you have one, you can find every player with huge potential and train it, so you have in 1 season a team that will be one of the best for many years. Some people pay with money, some people pay with their time and put a lot of effort to find good players with no contract. Otherwise, their would be no difference between coming online once a week, and coming online daily and that would make the game more boring. I say: if you want to be one of the best, you got to make time for it. If a manager didn't even come online last weekend, knowing that a lot of players would be auctioned and be free, you probably are not planning to be one of the best. Edited by Cultif 20-06-2011 18:19 |
20/06/2011 18:17 |
| Kings XI Punjab - Div1/Gr1 | ||
|
Username
280 msgs.
First-team player
|
rebsiot said: In the real world, if *messi's contract expired* or he was released by the team, he would be sold for 0. That's what people are failing to realize AUCTION INVALIDATES RELEASE CLAUSE. If a player comes off of auction with no owner, then he has no release clause. *Exactly the same as a newly generated youth* There was no bug. Only expected and realistic behavior. The *MISTAKE* was voiding all of the contracts at once, then expecting everything to turn out great. What was supposed to happen: 1 .- Players finish their contract 2.- Players are put on auction according to their price age 3- Players that are not sold on auction, get deleted. Everything went ok, except step 3, so it was a bug. Otherwise, tell me, what's the logic in auctioning something, knowing it will be set to 0€ after the auction? Obviously, there is no logic on that, because that was never suppose to happen. Edited by @Rand 20-06-2011 18:18 |
20/06/2011 18:18 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
221 msgs.
Substitute
|
@Rand said: What was supposed to happen: 1 .- Players finish their contract 2.- Players are put on auction according to their price age 3- Players that are not sold on auction, get deleted. Everything went ok, except step 3, so it was a bug. Otherwise, tell me, what's the logic in auctioning something, knowing it will be set to 0€ after the auction? Obviously, there is no logic on that, because that was never suppose to happen. Edited by @Rand 20-06-2011 18:18 I think most of us agree NOW (after we've been told) with the fact that Step 3 wasn't planned. But this topic is to PROTEST AGAINST THE 20%AVG RULE; not to discuss what went wrong. |
20/06/2011 18:21 |
| Kings XI Punjab - Div1/Gr1 | ||
|
Username
997 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
@Rand said: In the real world, messi will never be sold by 0€. But, even if it were, this is not the real world. This is a football game, and we have to work so the game is fair for everyone. Edited by @Rand 20-06-2011 18:08 This is so contradicting what you're saying. "Messi will not be sold for 0$ in real world.... this is not a real world, it's a game".... then means what you're saying is that Messi can be sold for 0$ here because it's not a real world... but that's not the case... If you want to be fair, you should first put teams according to their teams and not to team up a team with average 45+ with a team that has average 55+ in the same group. And any new team should not have a player over 45 average, I see teams get 60+ average players from the get go. Also if you want to be fair, you should allow very active managers to sign good players when others are sitting around and not doing anything. Everyone in this league had a chance to sign free agents and they chose not to. Don't you think that if you're a coach of a team and you see them every day, train, trade, scout you should have a better team that someone who comes over and sees his players once every one or two weeks? "not the lucky one who was in the good moment at the correct spot" , this had nothing to do with luck... I spent hours in this game between the seasons to make sure I can better my team and now I get punished for it. And the reply is that you want to be fair to others... others who? Players who are not active or show up once a week? Pretty much you want to be "fair" to the players who don't really care about this game and punish the ones who are most active... |
20/06/2011 18:29 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
221 msgs.
Substitute
|
Romasik2000 said: So true... |
20/06/2011 18:33 |
| Kings XI Punjab - Div1/Gr1 | ||
|
Username
997 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
@Rand said: What was supposed to happen: 1 .- Players finish their contract 2.- Players are put on auction according to their price age 3- Players that are not sold on auction, get deleted. Everything went ok, except step 3, so it was a bug. Otherwise, tell me, what's the logic in auctioning something, knowing it will be set to 0€ after the auction? Obviously, there is no logic on that, because that was never suppose to happen. Edited by @Rand 20-06-2011 18:18 So I get rid of my 45 average player (I fire him, not sell him... so I actually lost money) to sign a 50 average player and now I have a 40 average player because of your server glitch? How is that you being fair to active managers? |
20/06/2011 18:34 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
17
