| Forum » Foro Liga Shadow Masters (@FC Ubuntu) » Regular League discussion | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Username
1065 msgs.
International
|
+ArmoKidd+ said: hah if you have seen mlb, nfl, nhl replays, its not few seconds. It takes a couple of minutes. they have to look at every single possible angle before they make the call. And after that. of they cant figure it out, they take few mins to talk over and stick to the original call. It pains me to say, but Armo is right with certain aspects of what he said. They have limited it to 2:00 mins in the NFL. MLB does it for homeruns and NHL does it on goals. I know way too much about sports here in the States. It doesnt take seconds, but it does help get the calls right. Pretty sure we all agree that replay needs to be implemented.  Edited by Johnny Blaze 29-10-2012 23:54 |
29/10/2012 23:48 |
| Kind of a Big Deal ℠ - Div3/Gr11 | ||
|
Username
2030 msgs.
Best scorer
|
In the football games I watch, replays come up almost immediately. An imaginary line on the pitch can easily tell an offside without having to look at all angles. Dives and bad tackles can be looked into after the games as mentioned earlier. Edited by @FC Ubuntu 29-10-2012 23:51 |
29/10/2012 23:50 |
| FC Ubuntu™ - Div1/Gr1 | ||
|
Username
4993 msgs.
Best scorer
|
you have to choose. small delays during the game (for game changing decisions only) or the cheating & corruption that goes with it will just increase as the money floods in. for me the tipping point came and went years ago. i enjoy a good fa cup tie far more than any champions league or prem match. |
29/10/2012 23:51 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
4993 msgs.
Best scorer
|
@FC Ubuntu said: In the football games I watch, replays come up almost immediately. An imaginary line on the pitch can easily tell an offside without having to look as all angles. Dives and bad tackles can be looked into after the games as mentioned earlier. high five. my absolute ideal is hawkeye for offsides & goal-line, video ref for game changers, everything else via post-match panel. |
29/10/2012 23:53 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3645 msgs.
Best scorer
|
they could do the same for nhl, have an imaginary line if it went it or not, but its not as easy as you make it sound. | 29/10/2012 23:56 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2030 msgs.
Best scorer
|
+ArmoKidd+ said: they could do the same for nhl, have an imaginary line if it went it or not, but its not as easy as you make it sound. I think it's that easy in football. The video ref may not find it easy in very close calls (allowing the ref to decide) but it will at least eliminate those cases that are blatant. |
30/10/2012 00:01 |
| FC Ubuntu™ - Div1/Gr1 | ||
|
Username
3645 msgs.
Best scorer
|
then nhl refs should do the same. instead of taking minutes to make a call |
30/10/2012 00:02 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1065 msgs.
International
|
aleph44 said: @FC Ubuntu said: In the football games I watch, replays come up almost immediately. An imaginary line on the pitch can easily tell an offside without having to look as all angles. Dives and bad tackles can be looked into after the games as mentioned earlier. high five. my absolute ideal is hawkeye for offsides & goal-line, video ref for game changers, everything else via post-match panel. Double High five. |
30/10/2012 00:03 |
| Kind of a Big Deal ℠ - Div3/Gr11 | ||
|
Username
772 msgs.
MVP of the game
|
I think the one thing we all agree on is that some form of video tech should be implemented. Start with something easy, like goal line tech, and expand from there. The referral panel is another easy thing to setup to review cheating and poor challenges. Then trial hawkeye for offsides. Maybe introduce a manager challenge system like the NFL. At least try something........ |
30/10/2012 00:23 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
4993 msgs.
Best scorer
|
absolutely. | 30/10/2012 00:27 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
41
