| Forum » General » One on one | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Username
4993 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Langkymus said: I know this topic has been discussed endless times, but seeing strikers miss the goal 80% of the times in 1 v 1 situations but score from 30 yards and beyond with three defenders in between (to add insult to injury, often at 30 degree angle from the baseline) still cause me endless frustration. I strongly feel that the consequence of increasing shooting accuracy in 1 v 1 situations will not be disastrous. It will press managers to put more thoughts into making better defensive formation. Ultimately, the game should reward effort and ingenuity, right? bump - because this is killing the game for me. the post above is spot on. we've all moaned about the sim before, but it never used to irritate me. imo the current version of the sim actively penalises sides who get clear scoring chances. |
18/01/2013 16:40 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Fiscal
3449 msgs.
Best scorer
|
aleph44 said: Langkymus said: I know this topic has been discussed endless times, but seeing strikers miss the goal 80% of the times in 1 v 1 situations but score from 30 yards and beyond with three defenders in between (to add insult to injury, often at 30 degree angle from the baseline) still cause me endless frustration. I strongly feel that the consequence of increasing shooting accuracy in 1 v 1 situations will not be disastrous. It will press managers to put more thoughts into making better defensive formation. Ultimately, the game should reward effort and ingenuity, right? bump - because this is killing the game for me. the post above is spot on. we've all moaned about the sim before, but it never used to irritate me. imo the current version of the sim actively penalises sides who get clear scoring chances. Agreed. In the last week alone I've had a few games where I've had more than double the opponents shots but still only won by one goal. (They'll have 3 shots on target and 2 goals too) I'm stopping them from shooting, but it seems that they're getting a lot of free kick goals and sort of flukey goals. Meanwhile I'm running past their defenders, getting clear on goal and then shanking the shot. You could almost pull back your defenders and have forwards go for a 1 v 1 and probably come out on top. |
18/01/2013 16:48 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2960 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Langkymus said: I know this topic has been discussed endless times, but seeing strikers miss the goal 80% of the times in 1 v 1 situations but score from 30 yards and beyond with three defenders in between (to add insult to injury, often at 30 degree angle from the baseline) still cause me endless frustration. I strongly feel that the consequence of increasing shooting accuracy in 1 v 1 situations will not be disastrous. It will press managers to put more thoughts into making better defensive formation. Ultimately, the game should reward effort and ingenuity, right? uff how i wish my strikers to miss 80% i would score 2/10 that way http://en.strikermanager.com/jugador.php?id_jugador=676400 |
18/01/2013 17:00 |
| Mr. Q17 - Div1/Gr1 | ||
|
3168 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Every game would end 13-7 or so. What I would do, when a team is winning 4-0, 5-1, etc and instead of force them to miss every 1 on 1, is to make forwards of the winning team slower to avoid their arrival to the goal. We won't see 1 vs 1 and the amount of goals scored wouldn't be too high. Ofc if the losing team scores your forwards would be back to their normal speed. Just my suggestion... |
18/01/2013 20:25 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1798 msgs.
International
|
@Dnsvnsk said: Every game would end 13-7 or so. What I would do, when a team is winning 4-0, 5-1, etc and instead of force them to miss every 1 on 1, is to make forwards of the winning team slower to avoid their arrival to the goal. We won't see 1 vs 1 and the amount of goals scored wouldn't be too high. Ofc if the losing team scores your forwards would be back to their normal speed. Just my suggestion... Or improve defenders, make them tackle better and make them slightly faster than they currently are. That way single striker won't be able to dribble past 5+ defenders on his own for 1 on 1 chance. Div. 1, 2 and 3 wouldn't have score like 13-7, most managers there know how to handle formations and tactics. It's rediculous to watch your team having 1 on 1's whole 2nd half and opponent no chances just for him to score from long range from 1st shot in 88th minute. Of course sim compensates usually and gives you stoppage time goal for a draw, but you should have been 4-5 goals ahead by then. |
18/01/2013 21:22 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
4993 msgs.
Best scorer
|
@Dnsvnsk said: Every game would end 13-7 or so. don't agree with this. you will get the odd 13-0 due to superior tactics, but that should never have been stopped in the first place. the point stands - a long shot, a shot from a tight angle, a shot from a rebound or a shot where a defender is challenging the attacker should not have a better chance of scoring than an open goal. |
18/01/2013 21:43 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2484 msgs.
Best scorer
|
aleph44 said: @Dnsvnsk said: Every game would end 13-7 or so. don't agree with this. you will get the odd 13-0 due to superior tactics, but that should never have been stopped in the first place. the point stands - a long shot, a shot from a tight angle, a shot from a rebound or a shot where a defender is challenging the attacker should not have a better chance of scoring than an open goal. +1 |
18/01/2013 21:50 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
3168 msgs.
Best scorer
|
aleph44 said: don't agree with this. you will get the odd 13-0 due to superior tactics, but that should never have been stopped in the first place. Devs didn't like this results, some people complained about it and that's why a lot of 1vs1 are missed. |
18/01/2013 21:59 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
4993 msgs.
Best scorer
|
yup. and what we have now is rubbish. just so we get 'realistic' scorelines. i can't even imagine how crap it is for the lower divisions. can we at least ask the devs to consider making some changes to the beta? |
18/01/2013 22:36 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
452 msgs.
First-team player
|
@Dnsvnsk said: aleph44 said: don't agree with this. you will get the odd 13-0 due to superior tactics, but that should never have been stopped in the first place. Devs didn't like this results, some people complained about it and that's why a lot of 1vs1 are missed. So if we complain about 1 v 1 misses enough, then the devs will do something about it, right? |
19/01/2013 00:53 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
2
