| Forum » Doubts and questions » Bug Tactics, Punishable? | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
Should certain tactics, such as these, be susceptible to punishment as per the exploitation of game bugs rule?
|
||
|
Username
1725 msgs.
International
|
@rebsiot said: I agree abusive tactics should be punished, like Italian world cup matches. But they won't be. All you can do is sound like the chosen one talking about West Ham ancient, anti-competitive tactics... But these tactics can be beaten. There is no foolproof mechanism for winning. Edited by @rebsiot 06-02-2014 06:52 I would like to know how this could be beaten. AS the attacking forwards in the most recent game would not attack the offensive 1/3 with no defenders around. The only possibility I see is a mistake by the defenders. http://en.strikermanager.com/partido.php?id=14252138 Edited by Lusoccer18 27-02-2014 04:27 |
27/02/2014 04:27 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1725 msgs.
International
|
At the very least, a team should not be able to pass back to their own goalie. As that is the standard in football rules today. |
27/02/2014 04:28 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3059 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Lusoccer18 said: @rebsiot said: I agree abusive tactics should be punished, like Italian world cup matches. But they won't be. All you can do is sound like the chosen one talking about West Ham ancient, anti-competitive tactics... But these tactics can be beaten. There is no foolproof mechanism for winning. Edited by @rebsiot 06-02-2014 06:52 I would like to know how this could be beaten. AS the attacking forwards in the most recent game would not attack the offensive 1/3 with no defenders around. The only possibility I see is a mistake by the defenders. http://en.strikermanager.com/partido.php?id=14252138 Edited by Lusoccer18 27-02-2014 04:27 Not only, his GK passed the ball to the player front of him whom passed it back to the GK back and forth for most of the second half No subs were made as the game was never stoped, only passes back and forth btwn the GK and his player But yes this is same as any other tactic, right @reb? You must have watched a lot of football.. ah no wait, you guys use your hands and an oval ball in football, maybe you also thought Italy was a city in the US.. |
27/02/2014 04:34 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
1725 msgs.
International
|
maybe you also thought Italy was a city in the US.. We do have a Paris, Athens, and Berlin in Georgia |
27/02/2014 05:10 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
3059 msgs.
Best scorer
|
Lusoccer18 said: Was not for you Lus but for the ridiculous comment from reb Edited by Fahorax 27-02-2014 05:17 Edited by Fahorax 27-02-2014 05:17 |
27/02/2014 05:16 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
2149 msgs.
Best scorer
|
@practicesquad said: My personal feeling is, while I agree this tactic is a negative one, it is not against the rules to create. If that person feels it is the only way for them to win then they will have nothing when they are defeated. And I think there is a lot of freedom in the simulator, we should not be discouraging creativity. Ideas like this are never permanent, but if the simulator stays the way it is now then of course formations will evolve. The game of football didn't start with 4-4-2, that idea was developed more than a century after the game was created. I'm interested to see where the sim ends up, the only way to change it is for devs to change the nature of it (prevent backpasses, fix offside from throw-ins etc). Like others that have posted here, I have no interest in creating a formation like this (although it is ridiculously simple to implement). I prefer my team to attack aggressively but that's just me. I think it's good that the sim is free like this, for it to evolve these kinds of formations need to exist. It's up to you how you perceive it  I disagree @Practice... 'Yes' he has the freedom to use it and 'Yes' devs aint gonna do much about it; But then this where we look upon @'s and their role becomes important. You need to make the player aware that he cant keep on doing this again and again. Waiting till the devs troubleshoot this is not an answer, neither is waiting till a smarter guy manages to beat the tactics and share it with the rest. If we just wait, then @'s are doing injustice to many managers who spend good amount of time working and improving their tactics week after week. If this happens you are just hitting one more nail into the coffin for this sim. Many really good and experienced managers here have been beaten by this tactic; what would any newbie think? He will just use the same as he knows he can get away with it. How would you react if a div 3/4 team using these tactics wins the SC? That would be a final nail on the coffin. Handsoff approach is not the answer. |
27/02/2014 06:27 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
4993 msgs.
Best scorer
|
we do have the power as managers to stage a protest. I suggest every manager with one of these teams in their Div or Cup match creates their own goal defence formation. extremely important --> ONLY use it against sombritamix and anyone else who has used this tactic in the past. use it for the whole match which will almost guarantee a draw. hopefully 38 points will eventually relegate these teams. we can use this thread to list managers who start using it and warn each other for upcoming matches. |
27/02/2014 14:39 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Username
4993 msgs.
Best scorer
|
we do have the power as managers to stage a protest. I suggest every manager with one of these teams in their Div or Cup match creates their own goal defence formation. extremely important --> ONLY use it against sombritamix and anyone else who has used this tactic in the past. use it for the whole match which will almost guarantee a draw. hopefully 38 points will eventually relegate these teams. we can use this thread to list managers who start using it and warn each other for upcoming matches. |
27/02/2014 14:39 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Fiscal
3449 msgs.
Best scorer
|
aleph44 said: we do have the power as managers to stage a protest. I suggest every manager with one of these teams in their Div or Cup match creates their own goal defence formation. extremely important --> ONLY use it against sombritamix and anyone else who has used this tactic in the past. use it for the whole match which will almost guarantee a draw. hopefully 38 points will eventually relegate these teams. we can use this thread to list managers who start using it and warn each other for upcoming matches. +1 |
27/02/2014 15:56 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
|
Fiscal
1835 msgs.
International
|
This seems like a lot of nonsensical effort and sacrifice for the general user. It would be much easier for the authorities to simply apply the rules of the game and send out a short message to such users. I don't want to keep beating a dead horse, but this is a pretty cut and dry case and I would think that it could have been ended a month ago in thirty seconds. Of all the things that fiscals find the 'justification' to do, this is what gives them stage fright? | 27/02/2014 21:38 |
| - Div/Gr | ||
6
